LV Panel

Generator Synchronization and Paralleling Guide

Implementing generator paralleling and load sharing systems.

Generator Synchronization and Paralleling Guide

This guide covers generator synchronization including check-sync relay operation, automatic paralleling, isochronous and droop load sharing, power management systems, and protection requirements for multi-generator installations.

Need help applying this to your project?

Our engineering team can help you implement these concepts in your panel design. Contact Patrion for a consultation.

Get a Quote

Frequently Asked Questions

What does generator synchronization mean in an IEC 61439 paralleling board?

Generator synchronization is the process of matching a standby or prime generator to an energized bus before closing its circuit breaker. In an IEC 61439 generator paralleling board, the controller checks voltage, frequency, phase sequence, and phase angle so the incoming machine can connect without excessive transient current or torque shock. Typical synchronizing relays or PLC-based controllers compare the generator to the bus and only issue a close command within a narrow synchronizing window. For practical designs, this is coordinated with the power circuit breaker, voltage regulator, and governor. IEC 61439 governs the switchboard assembly, temperature rise, clearances, and short-circuit withstand, while breaker operation and protection functions are usually selected from product standards such as IEC 60947-2 for low-voltage circuit breakers. Proper synchronization reduces mechanical stress, prevents reverse power conditions, and supports stable load transfer across multiple generating sets.

How do load sharing systems divide kW and kVAr between parallel generators?

Load sharing systems divide real power (kW) and reactive power (kVAr) so each generator carries a controlled portion of the total electrical load. In practice, the engine governor handles kW sharing by adjusting fuel input and speed droop or isochronous control, while the automatic voltage regulator handles kVAr sharing by modifying excitation. For multi-set operation, a paralleled system may use analogue droop lines or digital communication networks, depending on the controller platform. Common industrial controller families include Woodward, ComAp, DEIF, and Deep Sea Electronics, each offering load share and synchronizing modules. The engineer must also verify generator capability curves, breaker coordination, and neutral/grounding strategy. Under IEC 61439, the assembly must still be verified for thermal performance, dielectric properties, and short-circuit behavior at the final rated assembly level, not only at component level. Correct load sharing prevents one alternator from overloading while another idles, improving fuel efficiency and machine life.

Which IEC standards apply to generator paralleling switchboards?

The primary standard for the assembled panel is IEC 61439, which covers design verification, temperature rise, dielectric strength, clearances, creepage, short-circuit withstand, and internal separation. If the board includes low-voltage circuit-breakers, IEC 60947-2 applies to molded-case or air circuit breakers used for generator incomers and bus couplers. For contactors and motor starters used in control or auxiliary circuits, IEC 60947-4-1 is often relevant. Generator sets themselves are commonly referenced against IEC 60034 for rotating electrical machines, while synchronizing and control logic may be implemented with controllers that interface with these standards through measured voltage and frequency inputs. In a practical project, the switchboard manufacturer should document design verification per IEC 61439-1 and the applicable part such as IEC 61439-2 for power switchgear and controlgear assemblies. This is critical because paralleling introduces higher fault levels and dynamic operating conditions than a single-source distribution board.

What breaker arrangement is typically used in a generator paralleling board?

A typical generator paralleling board uses one circuit breaker per generator incomer, plus a bus coupler or main outgoing breaker depending on the topology. In smaller plants, each generator breaker connects to a common bus, and loads are fed from a single bus section. In more robust systems, sectionalized buses and bus couplers improve availability by limiting the impact of a fault to one section. The breakers are usually air circuit breakers or molded-case breakers sized for generator duty and selected for the prospective short-circuit current, making IEC 60947-2 a key selection standard. The control system prevents closing a breaker out of sync and often includes interlocks for dead bus, live bus, and reverse power conditions. Mechanically and electrically, the switchboard must still comply with IEC 61439 for internal partitions, busbar supports, and short-circuit withstand verification. Proper breaker arrangement is essential for selective tripping, safe maintenance, and stable parallel operation during load steps or generator failure.

How is reverse power protection set in parallel generator controls?

Reverse power protection prevents a generator from motoring when it starts consuming power from the bus instead of supplying it. In paralleling systems, this is usually implemented in the generator protection relay or controller as a reverse active power element, commonly with a pickup setting expressed as a small percentage of rated kW. The setting must be coordinated with the engine manufacturer’s allowable motoring limit and the generator’s transient response. In many industrial installations, reverse power is combined with overcurrent, underfrequency, overvoltage, and loss-of-excitation functions. The protection logic should trip the generator breaker quickly enough to avoid mechanical damage but not so sensitively that normal load-sharing transients cause nuisance trips. From an IEC standpoint, the assembly is designed to IEC 61439, while the breaker and protective device characteristics align with IEC 60947-2 and the protection philosophy of the site. Good commissioning practice includes functional testing under simulated load to confirm trip thresholds and time delays.

What is the difference between droop sharing and isochronous load sharing?

Droop sharing and isochronous load sharing are two common control philosophies for parallel generators. In droop mode, engine speed and terminal voltage intentionally decrease slightly as load increases, allowing multiple sets to share load naturally without a master controller. This is simple and stable, especially for small generator fleets or mixed brands. In isochronous mode, the controller holds frequency nearly constant by actively adjusting fuel, and a dedicated load-share system coordinates the generators so they do not “fight” each other. Isochronous operation is often preferred where tight frequency regulation is important, but it usually requires more sophisticated communication and tuning. Reactive power sharing follows a similar concept using voltage droop or excitation control. The right choice depends on grid independence, load step severity, and controller capability from vendors such as Woodward, ComAp, DEIF, or Deep Sea Electronics. The paralleling board, however, still needs IEC 61439 verification for thermal and fault performance regardless of the chosen control method.

How do you verify a generator paralleling panel under IEC 61439?

Verification of a generator paralleling panel under IEC 61439 is done at the assembly level, not just by relying on component certificates. The manufacturer must demonstrate compliance through one or more methods listed in IEC 61439-1: testing, comparison with a verified design, calculation, or design rules. Key items include temperature rise, dielectric properties, short-circuit withstand, clearances and creepage distances, protective circuit integrity, and the suitability of busbars, supports, and enclosures. For a paralleling board, the verification must also consider the dynamic fault contribution from each generator when breakers close onto a live bus. Practical verification often includes routine tests such as wiring checks, functional interlock tests, phase rotation checks, and synchronizing simulations. If the assembly uses branded components like Schneider Electric Masterpact, ABB Emax, or Siemens 3VA/3WL breakers, those components still need to be integrated into a verified assembly with documented ratings. The finished board should be delivered with a technical file, test records, and rating nameplate data.

What causes hunting or unstable load sharing in synchronizing systems?

Hunting is the repeated oscillation of speed, frequency, voltage, or power output between paralleled generators. It usually results from poorly tuned governor and AVR settings, mismatched droop curves, slow or noisy communication links, incorrect CT polarity, or overly aggressive load-share gain. Mechanical issues such as worn fuel actuators or engine response delays can also contribute. In a digital paralleling system, hunting often appears after a load step or during synchronization if the phase angle window is too permissive or the controller reacts too quickly. The cure is usually a disciplined commissioning process: confirm correct polarity and scaling, tune kW and kVAr sharing loops, verify breaker closing time, and check the generator’s transient response against the controller’s assumptions. On the switchboard side, IEC 61439 compliance ensures the assembly can safely carry the electrical and thermal stresses, but stability still depends on correct system engineering. Vendors such as ComAp InteliGen, DEIF AGC, Woodward easYgen, and DSE synchronizing modules provide tuning parameters to minimize instability.