Both soft starters and VFDs reduce starting current, but they serve different purposes. This guide compares their technical capabilities, cost, complexity, harmonic impact, and application suitability to help engineers choose the right solution.
Soft Starter vs VFD: When to Use Which
Comparing soft starters and VFDs for motor starting applications.

Need help applying this to your project?
Our engineering team can help you implement these concepts in your panel design. Contact Patrion for a consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the key difference between a soft starter and a VFD for motor starting?
A soft starter reduces inrush current by gradually increasing voltage during motor start and, in some models, during stop. It does not control motor speed once the motor reaches line frequency. A VFD, by contrast, controls both voltage and frequency, so it can start the motor smoothly and regulate speed, torque, and acceleration throughout operation. In practical terms, a soft starter is best when you only need reduced mechanical and electrical stress at startup, while a VFD is the better choice when process control, energy savings, or variable speed operation are required. From a standards perspective, both are typically applied within low-voltage motor control assemblies designed and verified to IEC 61439, with motor starters and electronic control gear aligned to IEC 60947-4-2 for soft starters and IEC 61800-5-1 for adjustable speed drives.
When should I choose a soft starter instead of a VFD for pumps and fans?
Choose a soft starter when the load is a fixed-speed pump or fan and the main goal is to limit starting current, reduce water hammer, and ease mechanical stress without needing speed control during normal running. Common applications include centrifugal pumps, HVAC fans, conveyors with light starting torque, and compressors with limited start frequency. A soft starter is often lower cost, simpler to commission, and smaller than a VFD for the same motor rating. If the process can run at one speed and you only need soft acceleration, a unit such as Siemens SIRIUS 3RW, Schneider Electric Altistart ATS, or ABB PSTX is often sufficient. If the system needs throttling, flow control, or energy optimization across load variation, a VFD is usually the better engineering choice because it can reduce speed and match motor output to demand.
When is a VFD the better choice than a soft starter?
A VFD is the better choice whenever the process benefits from variable speed, torque control, or energy reduction during part-load operation. This includes pumps with changing demand, fans with large affinity-law savings potential, mixers, extruders, hoists, and conveyors requiring controlled acceleration or speed matching. A VFD also helps when you need precise torque at low speed, bidirectional operation, electronic braking, or closed-loop control with sensors and PLCs. Unlike a soft starter, a VFD can maintain optimal motor operating points and can significantly reduce energy use in variable-torque loads. For example, a Danfoss VLT, ABB ACS series, or Siemens SINAMICS drive can replace mechanical throttling and provide process-level control. Electrically, the drive must be selected for harmonics, cable length, motor insulation stress, and thermal performance in accordance with IEC 61800 guidance and the overall panel assembly verification requirements of IEC 61439.
Can a soft starter and a VFD both be used in the same electrical panel?
Yes, a soft starter and a VFD can both be installed in the same IEC 61439 assembly if the panel is designed for the different thermal, EMC, and short-circuit requirements of each device. This is common in mixed motor control centers where some motors only need reduced-start torque, while others require speed regulation. The panel designer must verify temperature rise, clearances, creepage distances, short-circuit withstand strength, and functional compatibility of the complete assembly under IEC 61439-1 and IEC 61439-2. For the drive section, additional attention should be given to airflow, segregation, cable routing, and EMC practices. Soft starters generate less harmonic distortion than VFDs, but both can create heat that affects neighboring equipment. Properly sized feeders, coordinated short-circuit protection, and manufacturer-recommended installation spacings are essential. This is why mixed panels often use separate cubicles or segregated compartments for ABB, Schneider, Siemens, or Danfoss motor control devices.
Do soft starters save as much energy as VFDs?
No. A soft starter does not provide ongoing speed reduction, so it usually does not deliver significant energy savings after the motor has started. Its main benefit is reduced electrical and mechanical stress during acceleration and, in some cases, a softer stop. A VFD can reduce energy consumption substantially on variable-torque loads such as centrifugal pumps and fans because power demand drops sharply when speed is reduced. This is where the affinity laws matter: reducing speed can cut power by much more than voltage-only starting methods. In fixed-speed applications, a soft starter may still be the most economical option because it avoids the higher first cost, harmonics mitigation, and commissioning complexity of a VFD. If your goal is simply to avoid nuisance trips, belt shock, or water hammer, a soft starter is often enough. If your goal is lower kilowatt-hours over the operating life, the VFD is typically the more efficient solution.
What are the main protection and panel design differences between soft starters and VFDs?
Soft starters and VFDs both require correct upstream protection, but VFD panels usually need more attention to harmonics, EMC, cooling, and motor-cable effects. A soft starter is typically used with a line contactor, bypass contactor in many applications, motor overload protection, and short-circuit protection coordinated to the prospective fault current. A VFD panel may also require line reactors, dv/dt filters, EMC filters, shielded cables, and sometimes sinus filters, especially for long motor leads or sensitive networks. In IEC 61439 terms, the assembly must be verified for temperature rise, dielectric properties, short-circuit withstand, and internal separation. In practice, products like Schneider Altivar, ABB ACS, or Siemens SINAMICS may specify minimum enclosure ventilation and installation clearances. Soft starters are usually easier to integrate when the objective is simple motor starting, while VFDs demand a more detailed system-level design review to manage harmonics, motor insulation stress, and electromagnetic compatibility.
Can a soft starter replace a VFD on a conveyor or compressor?
Sometimes, but only if the application does not need speed control or torque regulation during running. On a conveyor, a soft starter can reduce startup shock and belt stress if the conveyor operates at a fixed speed and the load profile is stable. On a compressor, a soft starter may work if the compressor is designed for across-the-line running and only needs gentler acceleration. However, many conveyors and compressors benefit from a VFD because it can adjust speed to match process demand, maintain pressure or throughput more efficiently, and improve control at low speed. For screw compressors, positive-displacement pumps, or conveyors with variable load zones, a VFD is often the preferred solution. The decision should consider motor duty cycle, start frequency, required torque at low speed, and any mechanical coupling limits. If the application needs only reduced inrush and no variable-speed function, a soft starter can be a valid, cost-effective substitute.
How do I decide between a soft starter and a VFD for IEC 61439 panel design?
Start by defining the functional requirement: do you only need reduced inrush and smoother acceleration, or do you need speed control, energy optimization, or process regulation? If the answer is only soft starting, a soft starter is usually simpler, cheaper, and easier to fit into an IEC 61439 assembly. If the answer includes variable speed or torque control, specify a VFD and design the panel accordingly. Next, check the motor nameplate, load type, start frequency, available short-circuit current, ambient temperature, enclosure ventilation, and any network harmonics requirements. In an IEC 61439 panel, the chosen device must be integrated with verified thermal performance, protection coordination, and internal separation. For technical selection, compare manufacturer tools from ABB, Schneider Electric, Siemens, or Danfoss, and confirm whether bypass contactors, reactors, or filters are needed. The best choice is the one that matches the load profile, control requirement, and panel architecture, not simply the lowest upfront price.